On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 10:31, Martin Kalcher
<martin.kalcher@aboutsource.net> wrote:
>
> i came to the same conclusions and went with Option 1 (see patch).
> Mainly because most code in utils/adt is organized by type and this way
> it is clear, that this is a thin wrapper around pg_prng.
>
> What do you think?
Looks fairly neat, on a quick read-through. There's certainly
something to be said for preserving the organisation by type.
Regards,
Dean