Re: BUG #17792: MERGE uses uninitialized pointer and crashes when target tuple is updated concurrently
| От | Dean Rasheed |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #17792: MERGE uses uninitialized pointer and crashes when target tuple is updated concurrently |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEZATCUszwWmc+d_rid5sB8k72S-V-DFbmKBDmQgHZj8RH6w_w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #17792: MERGE uses uninitialized pointer and crashes when target tuple is updated concurrently (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #17792: MERGE uses uninitialized pointer and crashes when target tuple is updated concurrently
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 11:29, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > I'm not sure that the location of the initialization is best. My first > impulse was to add it in line 3618, with the "Set global context" lines; > but then I think it's possible for one tuple of a partition to be routed > correctly and a later one that is concurrently updated suffer from an > improper value in cpUpdateRetrySlot. > Hmm, shouldn't it be initialised in ExecMergeMatched(), before line 2896, making the CMD_DELETE case match the CMD_UPDATE case? Otherwise maybe an update action could be matched initially, try a cross-partition update, setting cpUpdateRetrySlot due to a concurrent update, and then upon retrying, a delete action might match. Regards, Dean
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: