On 29 January 2015 at 04:00, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>> > If I'm following correctly, Peter's specifically talking about:
>> >
>> > [ USING ( <replaceable class="parameter">expression</replaceable> ) ]
>> > [ WITH CHECK ( <replaceable class="parameter">check_expression</replaceable> ) ]
>> >
>> > Where the USING parameter is 'expression' but the WITH CHECK parameter
>> > is 'check_expression'. He makes a good point, I believe, as
>> > "expression" is overly generic. I don't like the idea of using
>> > "barrier_expression" though as that ends up introducing a new term- how
>> > about "using_expression"?
>>
> I've gone ahead and made this minor change.
>
Don't forget the ALTER POLICY page. This and some of the other things
being discussed on this thread ought to be copied there too.
Regards,
Dean