On 7 February 2018 at 15:25, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you plan to press forward with this, then, or what's
> the next step?
>
Yes, I think the results are pretty good so far, especially for the
more non-uniform distributions. AFAICS it solves the 2 original
complaints, and I've not yet seen a case where it makes things worse.
I plan to do more testing (and if anyone else wants to, that would be
most welcome), and then barring any unexpected issues/objections, I'll
commit it. Probably not this week though.
Regards,
Dean