On 29 January 2013 00:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Of course this wouldn't be material for back-patching, but it seems to
> me there's still time to fix this for 9.3, and we should do so if we
> want to claim that the enhanced-errors patch uniquely identifies
> constraints.
I can see the case for fixing this, but I don't feel that it's
particularly important that constraints be uniquely identifiable from
the proposed new errdata fields.
--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan