Re: ERROR: tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command
От | Robins Tharakan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ERROR: tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEP4nAy1BT52u=yf+GKGgbDMAR3re6mM992DXaaoaZq1XQ5a1Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: ERROR: tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 19:42, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I came across $SUBJECT, which can be reproduced using the queries
> below.
I also stepped a few times on this the past few days. Here's a smaller repro:
$ grep -l -B100 "tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command" */source | xargs -i grep Assertion {}
--java.lang.AssertionError: ANALYZE;
--java.lang.AssertionError: ANALYZE( SKIP_LOCKED);
--java.lang.AssertionError: ANALYZE;
--java.lang.AssertionError: ANALYZE( VERBOSE);
--java.lang.AssertionError: ANALYZE( VERBOSE);
Repro SQL
=========
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE a(b boolean , UNIQUE(b)) ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS ;
CREATE TEMP TABLE d() INHERITS(a) ON COMMIT DROP ;
ANALYSE;
SQL Output
==========
$ psql postgres -f a.sql
CREATE TABLE
CREATE TABLE
psql:a.sql:6: ERROR: tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command
>
> This error happens in heap_inplace_lock(), and git-bisect says the
> first bad commit is:
>
> a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 is the first bad commit
I also arrived at the same commit.
Checking (914ea1c93c0~0) - 914ea1c93c - fail (1)
Checking (914ea1c93c0~10) - d89335eea6 - fail (1)
Checking (914ea1c93c0~30) - b0a4c3e88b - fail (1)
Checking (914ea1c93c0~70) - 57dec20fd4 - fail (1)
.
.
Checking (914ea1c93c0~1688) - a07e03fd8f - fail (1)
Checking (914ea1c93c0~1689) - dbf3f974ee - pass (0)
Surfacing Commit is a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257
Found using SQLancer / creduce.
-
robins
https://robins.in
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 19:42, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I came across $SUBJECT, which can be reproduced using the queries
> below.
I also stepped a few times on this the past few days. Here's a smaller repro:
$ grep -l -B100 "tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command" */source | xargs -i grep Assertion {}
--java.lang.AssertionError: ANALYZE;
--java.lang.AssertionError: ANALYZE( SKIP_LOCKED);
--java.lang.AssertionError: ANALYZE;
--java.lang.AssertionError: ANALYZE( VERBOSE);
--java.lang.AssertionError: ANALYZE( VERBOSE);
Repro SQL
=========
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE a(b boolean , UNIQUE(b)) ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS ;
CREATE TEMP TABLE d() INHERITS(a) ON COMMIT DROP ;
ANALYSE;
SQL Output
==========
$ psql postgres -f a.sql
CREATE TABLE
CREATE TABLE
psql:a.sql:6: ERROR: tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command
>
> This error happens in heap_inplace_lock(), and git-bisect says the
> first bad commit is:
>
> a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 is the first bad commit
I also arrived at the same commit.
Checking (914ea1c93c0~0) - 914ea1c93c - fail (1)
Checking (914ea1c93c0~10) - d89335eea6 - fail (1)
Checking (914ea1c93c0~30) - b0a4c3e88b - fail (1)
Checking (914ea1c93c0~70) - 57dec20fd4 - fail (1)
.
.
Checking (914ea1c93c0~1688) - a07e03fd8f - fail (1)
Checking (914ea1c93c0~1689) - dbf3f974ee - pass (0)
Surfacing Commit is a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257
Found using SQLancer / creduce.
-
robins
https://robins.in
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: