Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
| От | Junwang Zhao |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEG8a3LDY1YpGho8PJ2C1v_6LsG+PeEq7G1ZQ3dRJy8Ba3Pxzg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 1:00 PM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Junwang, > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 8:01 AM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Ashutosh, > > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 11:01 PM Ashutosh Bapat > > <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Junwang, > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 4:35 PM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I have some review comments, and hope some of them are helpful. > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > > doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml > > > > > > > > +<programlisting> > > > > +CREATE PROPERTY GRAPH myshop > > > > + VERTEX TABLES ( > > > > + products LABEL product, > > > > + customers LABEL customer, > > > > + orders LABEL order > > > > + ) > > > > + EDGE TABLES ( > > > > + order_items SOURCE orders DESTINATION products LABEL contains, > > > > + customer_orders SOURCE customers DESTINATION orders LABEL has > > > > + ); > > > > +</programlisting> > > > > > > > > order is a reserved keyword, so the following example will fail, we > > > > should not give a wrong example in our document. > > > > > > > > > > I tried those examples and they all worked. What error are you > > > getting? What is not working for you? > > > > Here is what I got, pay attention to the queries with singular `order`, it's a > > reserved keyword. > > I see it now. Sorry for missing it earlier. > > I think something like attached should fix the problem, if we want to > continue with the current example. FWIW, it demos that quotes can be > used with labels, but we don't necessarily do that with other objects. > I am not sure whether Peter would like to continue with the example or > use a different one avoiding this subtlety altogether. Hence not > including it in the overall patchset. > The patch WFM. Using a different one also works, maybe we can adopt part of the schema from LDBC SNB [1] [1] https://ldbcouncil.org/benchmarks/snb/ > > -- > Best Wishes, > Ashutosh Bapat -- Regards Junwang Zhao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: