Re: Transaction timeout

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Junwang Zhao
Тема Re: Transaction timeout
Дата
Msg-id CAEG8a3KDAWrCY5coVdfO6PNFbNJNgLOusNKE7advB8fy7_6jMw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Transaction timeout  ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Ответы Re: Transaction timeout  ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hey Andrey,

On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 1:14 AM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 22 Dec 2023, at 10:39, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I try to split the test for transaction timeout, and all passed on my CI [1].
>
>
> I like the refactoring you did in timeout.spec. I thought it is impossible, because permutations would try to
reinitializeFATALed sessions. But, obviously, tests work the way you refactored it. 
> However I don't think ignoring test failures on Windows without understanding root cause is a good idea.
> Let's get back to v13 version of tests, understand why it failed, apply your test refactorings afterwards. BTW are
yousure that v14 refactorings are functional equivalent of v13 tests? 
>
> To go with this plan I attach slightly modified version of v13 tests in v16 patchset. The only change is timing in
"sleep_there"step. I suspect that failure was induced by more coarse timer granularity on Windows. Tests were giving
only9 milliseconds for a timeout to entirely wipe away backend from pg_stat_activity. This saves testing time, but
mightinduce false positive test flaps. So I've raised wait times to 100ms. This seems too much, but I do not have other
ideashow to ensure tests stability. Maybe 50ms would be enough, I do not know. Isolation runs ~50 seconds now. I'm
temptedto say that 200ms for timeouts worth it. 
>
>
> As to 2nd step "Try to enable transaction_timeout during transaction", I think this makes sense. But if we are doing
so,shouldn't we also allow to enable idle_in_transaction timeout in a same manner? Currently we only allow to disable
othertimeouts... Also, if we are already in transaction, shouldn't we also subtract current transaction span from
timeout?
> I think making this functionality as another step of the patchset was a good idea.
>
> Thanks!
Seems V5~V17 doesn't work as expected for Nikolay's case:

postgres=# set transaction_timeout to '2s';
SET
postgres=# begin; select pg_sleep(1); select pg_sleep(1); select
pg_sleep(1); select pg_sleep(1); select pg_sleep(1); commit;
BEGIN

The reason for this seems the timer has been refreshed for each
command, xact_started along can not indicate it's a new
transaction or not, there is a TransactionState contains some
infos.

So I propose the following change, what do you think?

diff --git a/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c b/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c
index a2611cf8e6..cffd2c44d0 100644
--- a/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c
+++ b/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c
@@ -2746,7 +2746,7 @@ start_xact_command(void)
                StartTransactionCommand();

                /* Schedule or reschedule transaction timeout */
-               if (TransactionTimeout > 0)
+               if (TransactionTimeout > 0 &&
!get_timeout_active(TRANSACTION_TIMEOUT))
                        enable_timeout_after(TRANSACTION_TIMEOUT,
TransactionTimeout);

                xact_started = true;

>
>
> Best regards, Andrey Borodin.



--
Regards
Junwang Zhao



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Следующее
От: Corey Huinker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Statistics Import and Export