Hi,
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The basic issue was that the WAL logging for Create Index operation
> >> was oblivion of the fact that for unlogged tables only INIT forks need
> >> to be logged. Another point which we need to consider is that while
> >> replaying the WAL for the create index operation, we need to flush the
> >> buffer if it is for init fork. This needs to be done only for pages
> >> that can be part of init fork file (like metapage, bitmappage).
> >> Attached patch fixes the issue.
> >>
> >> Another approach to fix the issue could be that always log complete
> >> pages for the create index operation on unlogged tables (in
> >> hashbuildempty). However, the logic for initial hash index pages
> >> needs us to perform certain other actions (like update metapage after
> >> the creation of bitmappage) which make it difficult to follow that
> >> approach.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for sharing the steps to reproduce the issue in detail. I could
> > easily reproduce this issue. I also had a quick look into the patch and the
> > fix looks fine to me. However, it would be good if we can add at least one
> > test for unlogged table with hash index in the regression test suite.
> >
>
> There is already such a test, see create_index.sql.
> CREATE UNLOGGED TABLE unlogged_hash_table (id int4);
> CREATE INDEX unlogged_hash_index ON unlogged_hash_table USING hash (id
> int4_ops);
>
> Do you have something else in mind?
Yes, that's what i had in my mind. But, good to know that we already
have a test-case with hash index created on an unlogged table.
>
>
> I think the problem mentioned in this thread can be caught only if we
> promote the standby and restart it. We might be able to write it
> using TAP framework, but I think such a test should exist for other
> index types as well or in general for unlogged tables. I am not
> opposed to writing such a test if you and or others feel so.
I think, it would be a good thing to add such test cases using TAP
framework but as you said, it would be good to take others opinion as
well on this. Thanks.
>
> > Apart from that i have tested the patch and the patch seems to be working
> > fine.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> With Regards,
> Amit Kapila.
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma
EnterpriseDB:http://www.enterprisedb.com