Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots
От | Ashutosh Sharma |
---|---|
Тема | Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAE9k0Pm9BixgN3H+vhnfsj27XkQi1JJ6nqp+rKq9En5o4JS-Rg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: issue with synchronized_standby_slots (Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 3:33 PM Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > >> As for the synchronized_standby_slots, we can follow the behavior >> similar to check_synchronous_standby_names and just give parsing >> ERRORs. Any non-existent slot related errors can be given when that >> parameter is later used. >> >> -- > > > Please find attached a patch that implements this. I will work on adding a test for it. > I suggest removing validate_sync_standby_slots() entirely since there isn’t much left in it. The below logic currently in validate_sync_standby_slots() to parse the list of slots can be directly moved into check_synchronized_standby_slots(). /* Verify syntax and parse string into a list of identifiers */ ok = SplitIdentifierString(rawname, ',', elemlist); if (!ok) GUC_check_errdetail("List syntax is invalid."); -- With Regards, Ashutosh Sharma.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: