Not sure how to close my logged bug. But its safe to say its not a defect. Thank You for your help.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:26 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Martin Varady <martin.varady@gmail.com> writes: > I got what you would expect but still doesn't work. It is the enterpriseDB > version we bought for Oracle to Postgres conversions. > "EnterpriseDB 10.4.9, compiled by Visual C++ build 1800, 64-bit"
Well, you should have a word with EDB then, but what it sounds like is they install a nondefault date - date operator, or possibly remove PG's standard one so that timestamp - timestamp gets chosen instead. Which is probably reasonable if your goal is compatibility with Oracle.