2012/12/22 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>:
> On 21 December 2012 22:01, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>
>>> On the other hand, we are standing next to the consensus about
>>> reader-side; a unique row-security policy (so, first version does not
>>> support per-command policy) shall be checked on table scanning
>>> on select, update or delete commands.
>>
>> I don't feel that we've really reached a consensus about the
>> 'reader-side' implemented in this patch- rather, we've agreed (at a
>> pretty high level) what the default impact of RLS for SELECT queries is.
>> While I'm glad that we were able to do that, I'm rather dismayed that it
>> took a great deal of discussion to get to that point.
>
> Would anybody like to discuss this on a conference call on say 28th
> Dec, to see if we can agree a way forwards? I feel certain that we can
> work through any difficulties and agree a minimal subset for change.
> All comers welcome, just contact me offlist for details.
>
Of course, I'll join the conference. Please give me the detail.
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>