Re: Statistics Import and Export
| От | Corey Huinker |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CADkLM=fXFB63EKR7MCYkM1g1R3JgjaqZV_ReRGEvj585+-sMVw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Statistics Import and Export (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I like the description "STATISTICS DATA" because it differentiates from
You have Tomas to thank for that: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/bf724b21-914a-4497-84e3-49944f9776f6%40enterprisedb.com
the extended stats definitions. It might be worth differentiating
between "RELATION STATISTICS DATA" and "ATTRIBUTE STATISTICS DATA" but
I'm not sure if there's value in that.
I have no objection to such a change, even if we don't currently have a use for the differentiation, someone in the future might.
But how did you determine what to use for the .tag and prefix? In the
output, it uses the form:
It was the minimal change needed to meet Tomas's suggestion.
Statistics for Name: ...; Name: ...; Type: STATISTICS DATA; ...
I like this one best, because it clarifies the meaning of STATISTICS DATA.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: