Re: MD5 aggregate

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Benedikt Grundmann
Тема Re: MD5 aggregate
Дата
Msg-id CADbMkNPFHbevxzfDN5iCnR+pF18cPTbf0SC+GcVC0+7epZO3fw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: MD5 aggregate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers



On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Attached is a patch implementing a new aggregate function md5_agg() to
>> compute the aggregate MD5 sum across a number of rows.

> It's more efficient to calculate per-row md5, and then sum() them.
> This avoids the need for ORDER BY.

Good point.  The aggregate md5 function also fails to distinguish the
case where we have 'xyzzy' followed by 'xyz' in two adjacent rows
from the case where they contain 'xyz' followed by 'zyxyz'.

Now, as against that, you lose any sensitivity to the ordering of the
values.

Personally I'd be a bit inclined to xor the per-row md5's rather than
sum them, but that's a small matter.

                        regards, tom lane


xor works but only if each row is different (e.g. at the very least all columns together make a unique key). 


 

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib