Re: shared buffers
От | Marc Millas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: shared buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADX_1aZsMWO7S+fGs8-vTYke1244U1n8T9eT4vPYexKPmSPX+Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | shared buffers (Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Sorry,
'someone' launches some kind of batches without telling.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 3:42 PM Marc Millas <marc.millas@mokadb.com> wrote:
hello,got something strange to me:Same db ie. same data, around 1.2TB,one on pg13, one on pg16same 16 GB of shared_buffers,I am the single user.both have track_io_timing onon pg13, if I run a big request with explain (analyze,buffers),I see around 6 GB readif I do rerun the very same request, no more read(s), all data in the shared buffers cache. fineIf I check with pg_buffercache what's in it, I see the biggest tables of my request within the biggest users (in number of blocks used). All this is fine.next, if I do the very same on the pg16 machine, whatever the number of times I rerun the explain (analyze, buffers) of the same request, each time, the explain shows the same volume of reads. again and again.If I check with pg_buffercache, the set of objects stay the same, WITHOUT the objects of my request, just like if those objects where sticky.any idea ?thanks
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: