Re: Clarify the ordering guarantees in combining queries (or lack thereof)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Shay Rojansky
Тема Re: Clarify the ordering guarantees in combining queries (or lack thereof)
Дата
Msg-id CADT4RqCGMsRpW-76yhnzxJokjgOuo-faNu68Vdq4Lf3AKWPybg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Clarify the ordering guarantees in combining queries (or lack thereof)  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Clarify the ordering guarantees in combining queries (or lack thereof)  (Pantelis Theodosiou <ypercube@gmail.com>)
Re: Clarify the ordering guarantees in combining queries (or lack thereof)  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-docs

>> I was trying to understand what - if any - are the guarantees with regards to ordering for combining queries (UNION/UNION ALL/...). From this message[1], it seems that UNION ALL does preserve the ordering of the operand queries, whereas UNION does not (presumably neither do INTERSECT, INTERSECT ALL, EXCEPT and EXCEPT ALL).
>>
>> The documentation[2] makes no mention of this, I'd suggest adding a note clarifying this.
>
If you want ordered output use ORDER BY.

I don't see how that could be done. Consider the following:

(SELECT id FROM data ORDER BY id)
UNION ALL
(SELECT id FROM data ORDER BY id DESC);

If there's a guarantee that UNION ALL preserves ordering - as Tom seems to indicate in the thread quoted above - then the above works. If there's no such guarantee, then AFAIK the above can't be rewritten; putting the ORDER BY outside - on the results of the UNION ALL - would order all results rather than preserving each resultset's ordering.






В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "ideriha.takeshi@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: No documentation exists about ecpg ORACLE comptaible mode
Следующее
От: Pantelis Theodosiou
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Clarify the ordering guarantees in combining queries (or lack thereof)