Re: [RFC] How about changing the default value of defaultRowFetchSize?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Cramer
Тема Re: [RFC] How about changing the default value of defaultRowFetchSize?
Дата
Msg-id CADK3HHKEqqFRPT5PEP682JFV0M=h1OVf4VY6X711QcdgDzuTFQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] How about changing the default value of defaultRowFetchSize?  (Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit@tym.im>)
Ответы Re: [RFC] How about changing the default value of defaultRowFetchSize?
Список pgsql-jdbc
Дерево обсуждения
The only thing I disagree with is returning the internal number. 0 means it has not been set.


On 21 October 2016 at 08:12, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit@tym.im> wrote:
How in this case one would enable previous behavior (fetching all)?

Also as for me, 100 is too low. I'd make it 1000 and make configurable from the uri (defaultFetchSize).

Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn

Пт, 21 жовт. 2016 00:34 користувач Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> пише:
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> * When setFetchSize() is not called, or setFetchSize(0) was called
> getFetchSize() returns 100.
> The actual number of rows fetched is 100.

Sorry, not 100, but the value of defaultRowFetchSize.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vitalii Tymchyshyn
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: question regarding connection failover URL postgresql 9.6 (master/slave)
Следующее
От: Vitalii Tymchyshyn
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: question regarding connection failover URL postgresql 9.6 (master/slave)