On 2019-06-08 19:41:34 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote: > So the reason we are discussing using pgoutput plugin is because it is part > of core and guaranteed to be in cloud providers solutions.
IMO people needing this should then band together and write one that's suitable, rather than trying to coerce test_decoding and now pgoutput into something they're not made for.
At the moment it would look a lot like pgoutput. For now I'm fine with no changes to pgoutput other than binary
Once we have some real use cases we can look at writing a new one. I would imagine we would actually start with