Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Phil Sorber
Тема Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
Дата
Msg-id CADAkt-j5uE35F=Gr0eQ-K_z1iHkVwNZX_biH49fZu4nSr-2Otg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)  (Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> No maybe. But I think that all the client commands should follow the
> same rule. Otherwise a user would get confused when specifying
> options.

I would consider the rest of the apps using it as a consensus. I will
make sure it aligns in behavior.

>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fujii Masao

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: function for setting/getting same timestamp during whole transaction
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?)