On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>>> > Sure, PQping is useful for this very specific use case of seeing whether
>>> > the server has finished starting up. If someone came with a plausible
>>>
>>> Rename the utility to pg_isready?
>>
>> +1, the current version of the patch is already fitted for that and would
>> not need extra options like the number of packages sent.
>
> I am 100% fine with this. I can make this change tomorrow.
>
>> --
>> Michael Paquier
>> http://michael.otacoo.com
>
> Sorry I haven't jumped in on this thread more, I have limited
> connectivity where I am.
Here is the updated patch. I renamed it, but using v5 to stay consistent.