Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Phil Sorber
Тема Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Дата
Msg-id CADAkt-gSGWohHsyJzabrvfRo2+M3_0ntis81MjnM-BhYQ7Ty8A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> What I don't like is when I
> (or anyone) posts a patch and somebody says something that boils down
> to "no one wants that".  *That* ticks me off.  Because you know what?
> At a minimum, *I* want that.  If I didn't, I wouldn't have written a
> patch.  And usually, the customers I support want that, too.  Now,
> somebody else may not want it, and that is fine.  But IMHO, posting a
> patch should be considered prima facie evidence of non-zero demand for
> the associated feature.

+1

I'd much rather hear "what you are trying to accomplish is much better
done this other way." rather than, "why would you want to do this?" or
as you said "no one wants that."

>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomonari Katsumata
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dividing privileges for replication role.
Следующее
От: Phil Sorber
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)