On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Pavel Golub <pavel@microolap.com> wrote:
>> DP> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
>>
>> Seems like, we may also going to hit it and it would be cool this
>> vacuum issue solved for next PG version.
>
> Exactly which patch on this thread is someone proposing for commit?
>
I guess that is the patch I proposed. However I think that there still
is room for discussion because the patch cannot skip to cleanup vacuum
when aggressive vacuum, which is one of the situation that I really
wanted to skip.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers