Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoDp4Zabk49G94TdWrthfv+0mhHLA6yw-AJxxRSFWPep+g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 6:39 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 4:03 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 8:17 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I have a question - is there any interest to backport the solution into > > > > existing major releases? > > > > > > As long as this is the bug, it should be backpatched to all supported > > > affected releases. > > > > Yes, but I think we cannot back-patch the proposed fix to back > > branches as it changes the ReplicationSlot struct defined in slot.h, > > which breaks ABI compatibility. > > Yes, and I think Vitaly already proposed to address this issue. This > aspect also needs to be carefully reviewed for sure. > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 5:32 PM Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > I can prepare a patch where restart_lsn_flushed stored > > outside of ReplicationSlot structure and doesn't affect the existing API. Oh, I totally missed this part. Sorry for making noise. I'll review the patch once submitted. Regarding the proposed patch, I think we can somewhat follow last_saved_confirmed_flush field of ReplicationSlot. For example, we can set restart_lsn_flushed when restoring the slot from the disk, etc. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: