On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> "txn" can be used for abbreviation of "Transaction", so for example
>>> pg_fdw_txn_resolver?
>>> I'm also fine to change the module and function name.
>>
>> If we're judging the relative clarity of various ways of abbreviating
>> the word "transaction", "txn" surely beats "x".
>>
>> To repeat my usual refrain, is there any merit to abbreviating at all?
>> Could we call it, say, "fdw_transaction_resolver" or
>> "fdw_transaction_manager"?
>>
>
> Almost modules in contrib are name with "pg_" prefix but I prefer
> "fdw_transcation_resolver" if we don't need "pg_" prefix.
>
Since previous patches conflict to current HEAD, attached latest
version patches.
Please review them.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers