On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:01 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> > On 7 Sep 2021, at 13:36, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12.08.21 04:52, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 5:42 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 11 Aug 2021, at 09:57, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Additionally, refresh options as described in
> >>>> <replaceable>refresh_option</replaceable> of
> >>>> <literal>REFRESH PUBLICATION</literal> may be specified,
> >>>> except in the case of <literal>DROP PUBLICATION</literal>.
> >>>
> >>> Since this paragraph is under the literal option “refresh”, which takes a
> >>> value, I still find your original patch to be the clearest.
> >> Yeah, I prefer my original patch over this idea. On the other hand, I
> >> can see the point of review comment on it that Amit pointed out[1].
> >
> > How about this:
> >
> > - Additionally, refresh options as described
> > - under <literal>REFRESH PUBLICATION</literal> may be specified.
> > + Additionally, the options described under <literal>REFRESH
> > + PUBLICATION</literal> may be specified, to control the implicit refresh
> > + operation.
>
> LGTM.
+1
Attached the patch.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/