(We had better avoid top-posting[1])
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:01 AM Imseih (AWS), Sami <simseih@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> I agree, Renaming "index_vacuum_count" can be taken up in a separate discussion.
>
> I have attached the 3rd revision of the patch which also includes the documentation changes. Also attached is a
renderedhtml of the docs for review.
Thank you for updating the patch!
Regarding the new pg_stat_progress_vacuum_index view, why do we need
to have a separate view? Users will have to check two views. If this
view is expected to be used together with and joined to
pg_stat_progress_vacuum, why don't we provide one view that has full
information from the beginning? Especially, I think it's not useful
that the total number of indexes to vacuum (num_indexes_to_vacuum
column) and the current number of indexes that have been vacuumed
(index_ordinal_position column) are shown in separate views.
Also, I’m not sure how useful index_tuples_removed is; what can we
infer from this value (without a total number)?
Regards,
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Top-posting
--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/