On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 10:24 PM Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2018-Dec-27, Alexey Kondratov wrote:
>
> > To summarize:
> >
> > 1) Alvaro and Michael agreed, that REINDEX with tablespace move may be
> > useful. This is done in the patch attached to my initial email. Adding
> > REINDEX to ALTER TABLE as new action seems quite questionable for me and not
> > completely semantically correct. ALTER already looks bulky.
>
> Agreed on these points.
As an alternative idea, I think we can have a new ALTER INDEX variants
that rebuilds the index while moving tablespace, something like ALTER
INDEX ... REBUILD SET TABLESPACE ....
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center