Re: pgsql: Refactor COPY FROM to use format callback functions.
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Refactor COPY FROM to use format callback functions. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoCKs-AoEqhX_oFcxdTgFaE85xBT1aUaT81RSWEiFsAH8w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Refactor COPY FROM to use format callback functions. (Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Refactor COPY FROM to use format callback functions.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 2:16 PM Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for following up the patch! > > In <CAD21AoBA414Q76LthY65NJfWbjOxXn1bdFFsD_NBhT2wPUS1SQ@mail.gmail.com> > "Re: pgsql: Refactor COPY FROM to use format callback functions." on Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:56:19 -0800, > Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Right. I've attached the updated patch. > > In general, this approach will work but could you keep > the same signature for backward compatibility? > > > --- a/src/backend/commands/copyfromparse.c > > +++ b/src/backend/commands/copyfromparse.c > > > +bool > > +NextCopyFromRawFields(CopyFromState cstate, char ***fields, int *nfields, bool is_csv) > > +{ > > + return NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(cstate, fields, nfields, is_csv); > > +} > > NextCopyFromRawFields() uses > NextCopyFromRawFields(CopyFromState cstate, char ***fields, > int *nfields) (no "bool is_csv") before we remove it. So > could you use the no "bool is_csv" signature for backward > compatibility? > > bool > NextCopyFromRawFields(CopyFromState cstate, char ***fields, int *nfields) > { > return NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(cstate, fields, nfields, cstate->opts.csv_mode); > } I like this idea. > > > > @@ -738,6 +742,15 @@ CopyReadBinaryData(CopyFromState cstate, char *dest, int nbytes) > > /* > > * Read raw fields in the next line for COPY FROM in text or csv mode. > > * Return false if no more lines. > > + */ > > +bool > > +NextCopyFromRawFields(CopyFromState cstate, char ***fields, int *nfields, bool is_csv) > > +{ > > + return NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(cstate, fields, nfields, is_csv); > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * Workhorse for NextCopyFromRawFields(). > > It may be better that we don't split docs for > NextCopyFromRawFields() and > NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(). How about referring the > NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal() doc from the > NextCopyFromRawFields() doc something like the following? > > /* > * See NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal() for details. > */ > bool > NextCopyFromRawFields(...) > { > ... > } > > /* > * Workhorse for NextCopyFromRawFields(). > * > * Read raw fields ... > * > * ... > */ > static pg_attribute_always_inline bool > NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal() > { > ... > } > Agreed. I've updated the patch. I'm going to push it, barring any objections and further comments. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: