Re: Replication slot stats misgivings

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Masahiko Sawada
Тема Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Дата
Msg-id CAD21AoC5oNtu_02m9Tk49Bq==PqbQO3WOKPWNoR=aZG7SpZX8A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Replication slot stats misgivings  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 3:22 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 5:52 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> I have made minor changes to the 0001 and 0002 patches. Attached is
> the combined patch for them, I think we can push them as one patch.
> Changes made are (a) minor editing in comments, (b) changed the
> condition when to report stats such that unless we have processed any
> bytes, we shouldn't send those, (c) removed some unrelated changes
> from 0002, (d) ran pgindent.
>
> Let me know what you think of the attached?

Thank you for updating the patch.

I have one question on the doc change:

+        so the counter is not incremented for subtransactions. Note that this
+        includes the transactions streamed and or spilled.
+       </para></entry>

The patch uses the sentence "streamed and or spilled" in two places.
You meant “streamed and spilled”? Even if it actually means “and or”,
using "and or” (i.g., connecting “and” to “or” by a space) is general?
I could not find we use it other places in the doc but found we're
using "and/or" instead.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
Следующее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Problems around compute_query_id