Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 8:29 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> > Do you think that it's okay that we rely on the propagation of global
> > state to parallel workers on Postgres 13? Don't we need something like
> > my fixup commit 49f49def on Postgres 13 as well? At least for the
> > EXEC_BACKEND case, I think.
>
> Uh ... *what* propagation of global state to parallel workers?  Workers
> fork off from the postmaster, not from their leader process.

Right. I think we should apply that fix on PG13 as well.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/