Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sawada Masahiko
Тема Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
Дата
Msg-id CAD21AoBkjndQAq2Z-WbScMdHoX257BJj6sUYthwwFs2iL8YDhQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
Список pgsql-hackers
>   VACUUM [FULL] [FREEZE] ... [ANALYZE] [tname [(cname, ...)]
> | VACUUM [({FULL [bool]|FREEZE [bool]|...}[,...])] [tname [(cname, ...)]
> | VACUUM [tname [(cname, ...)] [[WITH ]({FULL [bool]|FREEZE [bool]|...})]
>
> REINDEX [{INDEX|TABLE|...}] name [[WITH] (VERBOSE [bool]|...)]
>
> EXPLAIN [[WITH] ({ANALYZE [bool]|VERBOSE [bool]|... [,...]})] <statement>
>

I don't think "(OptionName [bool])" style like "(VERBOSE on, FORCE
on)" is needed for REINDEX command.
EXPLAIN command has such option style because it has the FORMAT option
can have value excepting ON/TRUE or OFF/FALSE.(e.g., TEXT, XML)
But the value of REINDEX command option can have only ON or OFF.
I think the option name is good enough.

Next, regarding of the location of such option, the several
maintenance command like CLUSTER, VACUUM has option at immediately
after command name.
From consistency perspective,  I tend to agree with Robert to put
option at immediately after command name as follows.
REINDEX [(VERBOSE | FORCE)] {INDEX | ...} name;

Btw how long will the FORCE command available?

Regards,

-------
Sawada Masahiko



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Expanding the use of FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER for declarations like foo[1]
Следующее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2)