Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoBCn7RR0EYbK+1n5UTksc3CVn5AKvxBRSr7zR2eWqTTOw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Logical replication 'invalid memory alloc request size 1585837200' after upgrading to 17.5 (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 4:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 2:52 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) > <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > If the above hypothesis is true, we need to consider another idea so > > > that we can execute invalidation messages in both cases. > > > > The straightforward fix is to check the change queue as well when the transaction > > has invalidation messages. 0003 implemented that. One downside is that traversing > > changes can affect performance. Currently we iterates all of changes even a > > single REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INVALIDATION. I cannot find better solutions for now. > > > > It can impact the performance for large transactions with fewer > invalidations, especially the ones which has spilled changes because > it needs to traverse the entire list of changes again at the end. Agreed. > The > other idea would be to add new member(s) in ReorderBufferTXN to > receive distributed invalidations. For adding the new member in > ReorderBufferTXN: (a) in HEAD, it should be okay, (b) for > backbranches, we may be able to add at the end, but we should check if > there are any extensions using sizeof(ReorderBufferTxn) and if they > are using what we need to do. If we can make sure that that change won't break the existing extensions, I think this would be the most reasonable solution. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: