On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> scanned_tuples variable in LVRelStats is introduced by commit b4b6923e
>> but it seems to me that it's actually not used. We store num_tuples
>> into vacrelstats->scanned_tuples after scanned all blocks, and the
>> comment mentioned that saving it in order to use later but we actually
>> use num_tuples instead of vacrelstats->scanned_tuples from there. I
>> think the since the name of scanned_tuples implies more clearer
>> purpose than num_tuples it's better to use it instead of num_tuples,
>> or we can remove scanned_tuples from LVRelStats.
Thank you for the comment!
>
> I think we should only store stuff in LVRelStats if it needs to be
> passed to some other function.
Agreed. From this point of view, num_tuples is only one variable of
LVRelStats that is not passed to other functions.
> Data that's only used in
> lazy_scan_heap() can just be kept in local variables. We could rename
> the local variable, though, since I agree with you that scanned_tuples
> is clearer.
>
So we can remove scanned_tuples from LVRelStats struct and change the
variable name num_tuples to scanned_tuples. Attached updated patch.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers