Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Masahiko Sawada
Тема Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Дата
Msg-id CAD21AoAtYzXeuhPqGw89KxqcJWpSKxWRNkYzyJxAqJHZham==Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 1:30 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote:
>> Thanks for everyone, pushed with minor editorization
>>
>
> Thank you for committing!
> I found a typo in nbtpage.c and attached a patch fixes it.
>

I also found an incorrect documentation in create_index.sgml as follows.

     <term><literal>vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor</literal></term>
     <listitem>
     <para>
      Per-table value for <xref
linkend="guc-vacuum-cleanup-index-scale-factor"/>.
     </para>
     </listitem>
    </varlistentry>

I think it should be "Per-index". Attached a patch for fixing it. And
sorry for missing it at review.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions
Следующее
От: Nikhil Sontakke
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions