Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoApz+MspyiHMYea8krK=djwQG+9XfLLTmxi1UQzWMdXyw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 3:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> writes: > > yeah makes sense. Done in the attached, and bonus point I realized that the > > test could be simplified (so, removing useless steps in passing). > > Just a side note: tayra showed two instances of this failure today > [1][2]. That's not using valgrind. I wonder if we changed something > else recently that would make this more probable? > I've observed the third failure. I read through recent commits but have no idea what commit made this more probable. Comparing other tests on the success case[1] and failure case[2], it seems that tayra were slow overall. For instance, the 'build' and 'check' were 00:00:19 vs. 00:02:42 and 00:02:42 vs. 00:19:17, respectively. I'm not sure what caused tayra to be slower overall recently. Regards, [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tayra&dt=2025-03-05%2001%3A22%3A07 [2] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tayra&dt=2025-03-05%2013%3A42%3A17 -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: