Re: Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in pg_buffercache_pages while scanning the buffers

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:59 AM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
<satyanarlapuram@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 12:04 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 2:33 AM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
>> <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Masahiko,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:57 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 2:59 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 4:31 PM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
>> >> > <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Please find attached patch that adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS while scanning the buffers in pg_buffercache_pages.
Ichecked other functions in the module and this check already exists in pg_buffercache_numa_pages. 
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you for the patch!
>> >> >
>> >> > I think the patch is reasonable and it looks good to me. I'll push it
>> >> > to master early next week, barring objections.
>> >>
>> >> After reviewing this patch more, I'm leaning toward to backpatch this
>> >> change. The patch adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to
>> >> pg_buffercache_pages(), pg_buffercache_summary(), and
>> >> pg_buffercache_usage_counts(), and the latter two functions were
>> >> introduced in v16. Therefore, for v15 or older we can add CFI to only
>> >> pg_buffercache_pages() and apply this patch to v16 or newer. Thoughts?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks for reviewing the patch. Sounds good to me.
>>
>> Could you provide patches also for back branches? or shall I?
>
>
> Attached the patch for v15 and below. Please let me know if you need anything.
>

Thank you for the patch! It seems we need to #include miscadmin.h in
v15 and older. I've incorporated that change and pushed.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com