On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So we can remove scanned_tuples from LVRelStats struct and change the
>> variable name num_tuples to scanned_tuples. Attached updated patch.
>
> On second thought, I think we should just leave this alone.
> scanned_tuples is closely tied to tupcount_pages, so it's a little
> confusing to pull one out and not the other. And we can't pull
> tupcount_pages out of LVRelStats because lazy_cleanup_index needs it.
> The current situation isn't doing any harm, so I'm not seeing much
> point in changing it.
>
Hmm, since I agree the current situation isn't doing any harm actually
I don't push hard for this but I'd like to still propose at least the
original patch that fixes an inconsistent in the code.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center