On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think we can consider the atomic commit and the atomic visibility
>> separately, and the atomic visibility can build on the top of the
>> atomic commit.
>
> It is true that we can do that, but I'm not sure whether it's the best design.
I'm not sure best design, too. We need to discuss more. But this is
not a particular feature for the sharing solution. The atomic commit
using 2PC is useful for other servers that can use 2PC, not only
postgres_fdw.
Attached latest 3 patches that incorporated review comments so far.
But recovery speed improvement that is discussed on another thread is
not incorporated yet.
Please give me feedback.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center