On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 2:14 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> afaict for deferrable READ ONLY DEFERRABLE transactions we could
> trivially allow parallelism? Am I missing something?
I think you are right. What's more, DEFERRABLE transactions seem very
likely to be cases where parallelism would be especially beneficial.
Will take care of it.
--
Kevin Grittner
VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/