Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Karina Litskevich
Тема Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Дата
Msg-id CACiT8iYuiBEAe2-ScKkj8cK_HygdYqzHYAvrbaG5bN5G+iAMZQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.  (Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.  (Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Hi, hackers!

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:00 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote:
0005: Rename checkunique parameter to more user friendly as proposed by Peter Eisentraut and Alexander Korotkov

I'm not sure renaming checkunique is a good idea. Other arguments of
bt_index_check and bt_index_parent_check functions (heapallindexed and
rootdescend) don't have underscore character in them. Corresponding
pg_amcheck options (--heapallindexed and --rootdescend) are also written
in one piece. check_unique and --check-unique stand out. Making arguments
and options in different styles doesn't seem user friendly to me.

Best regards,
Karina Litskevich
Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com/ 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: AIX support