Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alex Friedman
Тема Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage
Дата
Msg-id CACbFw62-WR9sgwXv8nQ7Co0szBOrkqmcHhRP7T+s0b9VuVmuUg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Doc fix of aggressive vacuum threshold for multixact members storage
Список pgsql-hackers
>I decided to leave this out, since I just remembered that the most
> likely change is actually to move to 64-bit offsets, as was proposed
> here and has some enthusiastic support:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACG=ezaWg7_nt-8ey4aKv2w9LcuLthHknwCawmBgEeTnJrJTcw@mail.gmail.com

Thanks for the review and the draft, looks good to me, and I'm okay
with doing this without the code comments. However, it seems like that
thread is just the beginning of wider changes (if they indeed happen),
which may impact these calculations as well, and then maybe a doc
update reminder may come in useful?

Best regards,

Alex Friedman



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: