Re: AutoVacuum and growing transaction XID's

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От github kran
Тема Re: AutoVacuum and growing transaction XID's
Дата
Msg-id CACaZr5T4P8oo45gvqOKn8CrAatGr-POW0=jpHzEXZ4zn5U3mCA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: AutoVacuum and growing transaction XID's  (Michael Lewis <mlewis@entrata.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Thanks for yous suggestions Michael  and David.

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 4:11 PM Michael Lewis <mlewis@entrata.com> wrote:
autovacuum_naptime being only 5 seconds seems too frequent. A lock_timeout might be 1-5 seconds depending on your system. Usually, DDL can fail and wait a little time rather than lock the table for minutes and have all reads back up behind the DDL.

Given you have autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit set to unlimited (seems very odd), I'm not sure a manual vacuum freeze command on the tables with high age would perform differently. Still, issuing a vacuum freeze and then killing the autovacuum process might be worth trying.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: PostgreSQL-12 replication failover, pg_rewindfails
Следующее
От: Michael Lewis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hash partitioning, what function is used to compute the hash?