Re: Question Regarding Merge Append and Parallel Execution of Index Scans on Partitioned Table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ayush Vatsa
Тема Re: Question Regarding Merge Append and Parallel Execution of Index Scans on Partitioned Table
Дата
Msg-id CACX+KaNB0O4pJep0QukyR=c7GMxQTWjRGnJemm5OsCxRWRuJnw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Question Regarding Merge Append and Parallel Execution of Index Scans on Partitioned Table  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Question Regarding Merge Append and Parallel Execution of Index Scans on Partitioned Table
Список pgsql-hackers
> The input node to the Gather Merge needs to be sorted by
> something, and the output of the Gather Merge will be sorted by the
> same thing.
Ok now I got that. Thanks for the clarification.

Last small question:
As of now parallelism in merge append is not supported, but it could 
be something we can consider implementing in the future.

That said, I’m wondering if this might not be necessary, given that 
Gather Merge already accomplishes similar functionality. Would 
love to hear your thoughts on whether there’s a distinct advantage to 
adding parallelism to Merge Append or if Gather Merge sufficiently 
covers all the use cases.

-----------------
Thanks,
Ayush Vatsa
SDE AWS

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: