Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Naylor
Тема Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Дата
Msg-id CACPNZCstUFYx-dSGodtxbozo0S9MrrNhjVS_AT7YXiXyc3ZA3Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:44 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> [patch to shrink oid index]

It would help maintaining its newfound sveltness if we warned if a
higher oid was assigned, as in the attached. I used 6200 as a soft
limit, but that could be anything similiar.

-- 
John Naylor                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)