Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От jian he
Тема Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug
Дата
Msg-id CACJufxGsB1ciahkNDccyxhw-Pfp_-_y+Wx+1BOdRyVVxKojAbg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
looking around.
I found other three minor issues. attached.

I am not sure the pg_class "relam" description part is correct. since
partitioned indexes (relkind "I") also have the access method, but no
storage.
"
If this is a table or an index, the access method used (heap, B-tree,
hash, etc.); otherwise zero (zero occurs for sequences, as well as
relations without storage, such as views)
"

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Force the old transactions logs cleanup even if checkpoint is skipped
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Why do indexes and sorts use the database collation?