Re: not null constraints, again
От | jian he |
---|---|
Тема | Re: not null constraints, again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACJufxG=M-8kY-9LmapFWipS8LzYoheBR+r58z_=kJmvT59sew@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: not null constraints, again (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
tricky case: drop table if exists part, part0 cascade; create table part (a int not null) partition by range (a); create table part0 (a int primary key); alter table part attach partition part0 for values from (0) to (1000); alter table ONLY part add primary key(a); alter table ONLY part drop constraint part_a_not_null; -- alter table ONLY part alter column a drop not null; Now we are in a state where a partitioned table have a primary key but doesn't have a not-null constraint for it. select indisunique, indisprimary, indimmediate,indisvalid from pg_index where indexrelid = 'part_pkey'::regclass; shows this primary key index is invalid. but select conname,contype,convalidated from pg_constraint where conname = 'part_pkey'; shows this primary key constraint is valid.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: