On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 12:58 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> Applied after a few tweaks, including changes to the comments, the
> suggestion of "division_by_zero" for the goto labels, and splitting
> the patch into two parts for pg_lsn and numeric.
/*
* Internal version of int8_numeric() with support for soft error reporting.
*/
int64
numeric_int8_safe(Numeric num, Node *escontext)
the above comment "int8_numeric" should be "numeric_int8"?