Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment
От | jian he |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACJufxEbn4+CL9QW7v8gogV1artoaV661WD6qXRhMNW6T7jkrw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 12:00 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 6:00 PM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote: > > in _tocEntryRestorePass > > if we do > > > > if ((strcmp(te->desc, "COMMENT") == 0 || > > strcmp(te->desc, "SECURITY LABEL") == 0) && > > strncmp(te->tag, "EVENT TRIGGER ", 14) == 0) > > return RESTORE_PASS_POST_ACL; > > > > then RestorePass related comments also need to be adjusted for security label? > > Could you clarify which comments should be updated for SECURITY LABEL? > I don't see any references to COMMENT in RestorePass, so it doesn't look > like any updates are needed there for SECURITY LABEL either. But maybe > I'm missing something... > typedef enum { RESTORE_PASS_MAIN = 0, /* Main pass (most TOC item types) */ RESTORE_PASS_ACL, /* ACL item types */ RESTORE_PASS_POST_ACL, /* Event trigger and matview refresh items */ #define RESTORE_PASS_LAST RESTORE_PASS_POST_ACL } RestorePass; I thought we needed to change the comments: " /* Event trigger and matview refresh items */". looking at the code again, we don't need to do that. Overall, all the patches look good to me. (I didn't test back branch related tests though)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: