Re: Postgres 11 release notes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski
Тема Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Дата
Msg-id CAC8Q8tKbYmNdiyWr7hE4GfMY4fbqHKkFziKgrUuWHH6HJQs3og@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres 11 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Postgres 11 release notes  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I'm not sure it is usefull in release notes since it is more about API, and not
> user-facing change. Just in case.
> GiST opclasses now can omit compress and decompress functions. If compress
> function is omited, IndexOnlyScan is enabled for opclass without any extra
> change.
> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/
> d3a4f89d8a3e500bd7c0b7a8a8a5ce1b47859128

Uh, we do have this for SP-GiST:

        Allow SP-GiST indexes to optionally use compression (Teodor Sigaev,
        Heikki Linnakangas, Alexander Korotkov, Nikita Glukhov)

I am unclear how far downt the API stack I should go in documenting
changes like this.

It is also a bit misleading - the idea in that change is that now index representation can be a lossy version of actual data type (a box instead of polygon as a referende, so a changelog entry can tell "Allow SP-GiST index creation for polygon datatype.").  There is no "decompression" for such thing. "compression" sounds like gzip for me in user-facing context.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL prefetch