Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Semab Tariq
Тема Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data
Дата
Msg-id CABimMB4Z_qfkNrbYGXp=+oO6WPdGkVm35s9Zm+0r8gVxz_=sog@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Ответы Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data
Список pgsql-bugs


On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 12:09 PM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 11:22:45AM +0500, Semab Tariq wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:22 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> > Thanks.  That shows the crash happened sometime after strcmp(defval1->adbin,
> > defval2->adbin).  Please run the attached version,
>
> PFA the new log file

> 0x40000000003fdc30:2 in equalTupleDescs (tupdesc1=0x60000000001fdb98, tupdesc2=0x6000000000202da8)
> 0x40000000003fdc30:2 <equalTupleDescs+0x10e2>:              br.call.sptk.many rp=0x3fffffffff3fdc30
> 0x3fffffffff3fdc30 in <unknown_procedure> ()
> 0x3fffffffff3fdc30:   Error accessing memory address 0x3fffffffff3fdc30: Bad address.

This postgres binary apparently contains an explicit branch to
0x3fffffffff3fdc30, which is not an address reasonably expected to contain
code.  (It's not a known heap, a known stack, or a CODE section from the
binary file.)  This probably confirms a toolchain bug.

Would you do "git checkout 166f943" in the source directory you've been
testing, then rerun the test and post the compressed tmp_check/log directory?

So make command fails after I applied the v0.4 patch to 166f943 also it did not create any tmp_check/log directory
PFA make output 

I'm guessing that will show the bad branch instruction no longer present.


--
Thanks & Regards,
Semab
Вложения

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #17274: Issue in upgrading package pgrouting: not signed
Следующее
От: Alexey Ermakov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #17268: Possible corruption in toast index after reindex index concurrently